Sunday, June 1, 2008

Suddenly, the plot thickens...

Candy writes...

Update about my stalker
For those following along with the revelation of my stalker (I deleted those dialoges now), the problem has been solved. The stalker was someone inpersonating my family member. Said stalker has lost access to this website, and will be a problem no longer. Problem solved. Thank you for your prayers.

14 comments:

concernedcitizen said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Matthew said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Matthew said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
concernedcitizen said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
concernedcitizen said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Matthew said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
concernedcitizen said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Sue Bee said...

Did somebody cue the Twilight Zone theme? Because I'm hearing it.

Please take the discussion of Candy's residence & husband's accomplishments elsewhere.

I understand how frustrating it is to read her blog and strongly disagree with it. Calling her names and digging into her "real life" is only going to create animosity.

I enjoy the the comparative theology aspects. If you enjoy those discussions, please join in.

Indeed, the plot thickened. I thought it would.

candyisascrazyasitgets has moved to http://www.candyisaliar.blogspot.com/ said...

http://candyisanutjob.blogspot.com/

go to this website and you will see all the lies that she has portrayed.
This isn't prying into her life, it is all on the internet. I googled it by her website, and she use to blog under her entire name and mentioned her husband on several occasions. her husband ran for office in CO so I don't see the issue with annonimity. I am not publishing her address, her kids names, or anything else that takes a detective to find. When someone makes claims that you can find the truth within a couple of key strokes that is not prying. The other thing that goes along with your comment is that you can not have a theological discussion with her. She is intolerant, and not very well educated. She will edit your comments, so what type of discussions are you having?

Sue Bee said...

Being able to easily obtain information does not make it right to do so. Nor does it make it right to share that information in order to harm someone’s reputation.

There are a number of bloggers discussing/comparing theological and ideological issues in relation to Candy’s site without resorting to ad hominem remarks.

luckie50 said...

I think what the person is trying to say is that the information out there is posted by Candy, herself, and her husband. Like the fact he hasn't paid taxes since the late 90's. That doesn't sound so Christian to me.